
What is the purpose of the study?
What are the data?
What are main conclusions/recommendations?
Comment on validation issues
Comment on the author's coding of variables
Comment on Table I (p. 79)
Comment on Table 2 (p. 80)
Comment on Figure 1 (the correspondence map), p. 82
Comment on Conclusions:
1. Comment: "High Level or Personal Attention from Instructors is so far from all the universities that this represents a great strategic opportunity...." (P. 81, bottom).
2. Comment: "University H should emphasize other attributes with which it is closely aligned in Figure 1. For instance, Low Cost of Tuition and Convenience of Location should be stressed in promotional efforts...(also) the university should emphasize its successful retention programs."
Comment on the Assumptions of Correspondence Analysis as listed in StatNotes, in comparison with this article.
Discuss omissions in the discussion of eigenvalues
What can be said about the failure to report contribution of dimensions to points?